طوطي و بقال

at first when you read it,you don't feel that it's for long time ago.i think one of it's reasons is that MOLANA is playing with the past tense(sometimes simple past,sometimes past progressive & ....).He uses beautiful structures like-he was seated-to show a very important and strong position.the ing mood is another reason to make it alive and everlasting.Another point is that when you don't talk for someday and suddenly start talking you screech ( means shout with an unclear voice) and both Molana and Nicolson have paid attention to these points and it shows their master.Everyone's analogy is measuring the action of others.Before starting the analysis we know what Molana is going to say.How have we got this point?Isn't it a kind of معرفت that we all have.How do we have this kind of marefat and from where?According to Nicolson's wordsمعرفوت به سكوت نزديكتر است تا به سخن.In the second part when Molana compares different kinds of species he uses simple present and it means it's a fact and a nonstop event .Have you ever asked yourself why it is like this?I mean the same action but different resctions.Like quite different children from the same parents? WHY?I think one of the important roles is our inside sound.But where does this inside sound come from?But another question arises that what makes a person holy and the other an evil? I call some words like hypocrite,energetic words?do you know why?because as here is said when you call someone such words that guy becomes filled with fire and that means it transforms negative energy and vice_versa .But how some persons like Molana can be neutral in front of these energetic words?Can you remember our pre_university book(two guys shouting and contending,Molana told one of them:هرچه ميخواهي به من بگو كه اگر هزار گويي يكي نشنوي .What has happend to a man like Molana who can act like this and cab be calm toward these kinds of tastes of HELL?IS HISS INSIDE SOUND DIFFERENT?BUTT AGAIN HE IS ONE OF US..